|

Index
- Home
- Interactive data
- Maps
- Graphs
- Images
- Videos
- Executive summary
- Introduction
Methods
-
Survey design
- Towed video
- BRUVS
- ROV
- Data analysis
Results
-
Habitats
- Fish
- Ballina angelfish
Discussion
-
Fish and benthos
- Conclusions
- Recommendations
- Acknowledgements
- References
- Appendices
(PDF)
Download
-
Survey report
(PDF)
|
|
Deeper water fish and benthic surveys
in the Lord Howe Island Marine Park:
February 2004
Methods
Baited Remote Underwater Video Stations (BRUVS)
The six BRUVS consisted of a galvanized
roll-bar frame enclosing a simple camera housing made from PVC pipe with
acrylic front and rear ports. Stabilizing arms and bait arms (20 mm
plastic conduit) were attached and detached during and after deployment.
The 1.5m bait arm held a 350 mm plastic mesh bait canister containing
one kilogram of crushed pilchards, Sardinops neopilchardus (Fig. 3).
BRUVS were deployed with 6mm Spectra ropes and two 30cm surface floats
bearing a flag, and were retrieved with an electric capstan.

Figure
3. Drawing of the BRUVS equipment showing the frame with
stabiliser legs, camera housing and bait arm.
SonyTM MiniDV Handicams (model TRV18E) with wide-angle
lenses (0.6X) were used in the housings. Exposure was set to “Auto”,
focus was set to “Infinity/manual”, “Long Play” mode was selected,
and date/time codes were overlaid on footage. The BRUVS were
deployed to provide 90 minutes of film recorded at the seabed and
were set ~ 300m apart to provide independence of each replicate unit
(Cappo et al. 2003, 2004).
Interrogation of each tape provided the time the BRUVS settled on
the seabed and, for each species, the time of first sighting (TFAP),
time of first feeding at the bait, the maximum number seen together
in any one time on the whole tape (MaxN), time at which MaxN
occurred, and the intraspecific and interspecific behaviour. The
development of these statistics to measure relative abundance of
fishes is reviewed by Cappo et al. (2003, 2004). The common
names used in this report include local islander names where
possible.
It was planned that a fleet of six BRUVS would be set in selected
habitats identified by the towed camera array. However, on the first
set two BRUVS were lost due to snagging of the rope in heavy swell,
and it was decided to set only 4 BRUVS in flat shelf habitats
inshore of the steep shelf break. A total of 23 BRUVS sets were made
along 5 of the 21 towed camera transects, and a further set of one
unit was made in Comet’s Hole (Appendix 3). Given the prevailing sea
conditions and rugose seabed topography, there was a high risk of
loss of the BRUVS associated with snagging or submergence of the
buoys on the shelf edge, and the towed video camera provided the
only useful records of fish species and numbers in those areas. The
general area of each BRUVS station and the precise GPS position of
each set were recorded (Fig. 2 and Appendix 3).
December 18, 2008
|
|